About your Search

20130301
20130331
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7 (some duplicates have been removed)
on the streets of san francisco. francis jan joins us now. it is great to have you here. [ applause ] >> earlier francis, you had a lot of trials and tribulations. your mother died in child birth and your stepmother died in a car accident. i think your dad died when you were 12. this is enough to make most people to mate god. it did not cause you to hate god; why not? >> i had an understanding of what jesus taught in the bible. you will have pain on the earth. we live in a fallen world and there is pain and for me i understood he didn't promise me a easy life. he said it would be difficult and because of the fall it is it a world we live in and for me, it caused my to cling more to god. as a kid when your mom and step-mom dies and your dad dies, life is going to be over any second and it is it not about this time on earth. my life end now before the show is over. you start to think that way and go i got to know what this is all about . caused me to search diaper. >> that is it a different gospel. i am not picking anybody out . i often hear preaching that said you turn your life over to jesus, yo
kimberly guilfoyle who was assistant district attorney in san francisco. kimberly, if you had your role as a district attorney still going on this case came before you, would you you prosecute is in the same way? >> i would. i think this is a creative prosecution. these are the types of cases could be tough to get a defendant on. this is someone that they really truly believe is a menace to society, is dangerous and should be put away. the key is how do you go about doing it lawfully. what laws has the man broken. the defense will say this was a thought crime. you you can't prosecute someone for their thoughts he didn't act it out. the law you does not allow someone to sit there and fanta advertise aboufantasize about n commit the act and then prosecute them. the whole idea is to get them before they commit the crime. they prosecuted him under a conspiracy theory which means two or more people get together and talk about an idea and there is an over the act. a step taken towards completing it. here conspiracy it kidnap. he had specific target victims including his wife. one woman in par
guilfoyle who was assistant district attorney in san francisco. >> if you had your role of district attorney and the case came before you, would you prosecut prosecute it in the same way. >> and this is someone they truly believe is a menace to society and is dangerous and should be put away. the key, how do you go about doing it lawfully. the fredefense would say it's a thought crime. he did not act it out. the law does not allow someone to sit and fantasize ideas like this and commit the act before you prosecute him. the idea is to get him before they commit the crime. preempt it. they prosecuted him under a conspiracy theory two or more people get together and talk about an idea they have and there's an act. are there steps taken towards completing. conspiracy to kidnap. writing online and target victims including his wife, one woman in particular he was going to be paid $5,000 it kidnap her and then carry out his plot. so the law says that's enough. they had sufficient evidence to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt and the other is accessing the federal data base. he was going through
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)